Student Grade Appeals Policy Guidelines (Revised - March 2015)
Policies and Procedures
Policies and procedures adopted by the School of Information Sciences faculty relative to student appeal of grades. The following policy guidelines are provided to assure the establishment of procedures, which will provide for the prompt, fair and equitable resolution of grade appeals.
1.0 Basic Principles
1.1 Instructors are expected to evaluate student work according to sound academic standards. Equal demands are required of all students in a class (although more work is expected from graduate students than from undergraduates), and grades are assigned without departing substantially from announced procedures.
It is the instructor's prerogative to assign grades in accordance with his/her academic/professional judgment, and the student assumes the burden of proof in the appeals process.
1.2 Grounds for appeals are: (1) the application of non-academic criteria in the grading process, as listed in the university's non-discrimination/affirmative action statute: race, color, sex (including gender identity), national origin, religion, age, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, height, weight, disability, or veteran status; (2) sexual harassment or discrimination; or (3) evaluation of student work by criteria not directly reflective of performance relative to course requirements.
1.3 These policy guidelines do not apply to allegations of academic dishonesty. Academic dishonesty matters should be addressed under the Student Code of Conduct statute.
Appeal of Grades
A student's first appeal shall be directed to the instructor in charge.
Students and faculty may contact the Ombudsman at any time for assistance with any problem associated with a grade decision or grade appeal.
Formal Appeal: Initiation of Appeal
To initiate the appeal process, the student shall submit a written statement detailing his/her objections, along with supporting documentation, to the School of Information Sciences Director. The student must file the written appeal within 30 calendar days following official notification of grades for the term in which the disputed grade was awarded, whenever informal review fails to resolve a dispute.
School of Library and Information Science Review
The SIS Director shall assemble all written documentation and oral testimonies from the student and instructor in charge. If the matter is not resolved to the satisfaction of all parties, the Program Director shall convene a Grade Appeals Committee. Students shall be notified in writing of the department's decision regarding the appeal within 60 days of lodging the formal appeal.
Grade Appeals Committee
An ad hoc committee of three faculty members appointed by the Director, and one student (appointed by the Library and Information Science Student Association [SOLIS]), shall consider the appeal. The School of Information Sciences Director shall appoint a Committee Chair. Opportunity will be given to both the student and the instructor to state their cases before a decision is made by the committee.
All meetings held in relation to the appeal shall provide parties the opportunity to present additional information orally or in writing. No additional persons will be permitted at such meetings without advance approval by the Chair, Director, or Dean, as appropriate. The decision of the Grade Appeals Committee will be reported to the Director. Matters not resolved at the School level may be appealed to the Dean.
If the appeal is not resolved at the School level the student may initiate a review by the Dean of the University Library System.
Review by Vice President for Academic Affairs (VPAA)
If review procedures available to the student have been exhausted, the student may initiate VPAA Review. Procedures for VPAA Review are contained in the University Guidelines for Grade Appeal.